UK’s most common fee structure benefits managers not investors

AdvisorThe most commonly used fee structure in the UK may benefit fund managers, but it is the least appropriate from the perspective of investor welfare, according to a report by Cass Business School. The research, which adds to the on-going debate over management fees says fund managers should consider adopting a fee structure that better aligns investors' and managers' interests, by sharing losses as well as gains. Academics at Cass are now pushing for a review of fund charges levied across the UK asset management industry, after the study discovered that the most prevalent fee structure, a charge fixed as a proportion of assets under management, is best suited to fund managers but rarely suitable for their clients. In the report – called Heads we win, tails you lose – researchers at Cass, part of City University London, compared the effect of three different mutual fund fee structures on the financial well being of investors and managers. These included: fixed fee, in which the fee is fixed as a proportion of assets under management (AUM); asymmetric fee, where the base fee is fixed as a proportion of AUM, but the manager can also earn a portion of upside performance; and symmetric fee, a performance-based structure where investors and managers share both the down and upside of performance. Professors Andrew Clare, Richard Payne, Nick Motson and Steve Thomas simulated the performance of thousands of fund managers with varying degrees of skill, using a benchmark return matched to the FTSE 100. They then calculated the average financial wellbeing of investors and fund managers resulting from the manager performance. Professor Payne says: "The study identifies a clear incentive mismatch between the best interests of investors and managers. More specifically, there is no single structure that simultaneously maximises both the investors' and the managers' satisfaction." Co-author, professor Clare, says it is time for a serious debate about fund management fee structures. He adds: "Our results show that a symmetric fee structure is, on the whole, in the best interest of investors. How long can an industry ignore the best interests of its customers?" The research was sponsored by Orbis Investment Management. ©2014 funds europe

Executive Interviews

INTERVIEW: Put your money where your mouth is

Jun 10, 2016

At Kempen Capital Management, they believe portfolio managers should invest in their own funds. David Stevenson talks to Lars Dijkstra, CIO of the €42 billion manager.

EXECUTIVE INTERVIEW: ‘Volatility is the name of the game’

May 13, 2016

Axa Investment Managers chief executive officer, Andrea Rossi, talks to David Stevenson about bringing all his firm’s subsidiaries under one name and the opportunities that a difficult market...


ROUNDTABLE: Beyond the hype

Oct 13, 2016

The use of smart beta investing continues to grow. Our panel, made up of both providers and users, discusses what the strategy actually means, how it should be used and the kind of pitfalls that may arise when using this innovative investment technique.

MIFID II ROUNDTABLE: Following the direction of travel

Sep 07, 2016

Fund management firms Aberdeen and HSBC Global meet with specialist providers to speak about how the industry is evolving towards MiFID II.