ESMA urged to reclassify SFDR labels

The European Securities and Markets Authority (Esma) should review fund classifications under SFDR as confusion around the labels continues, says an industry body.

In a letter to the regulator, the Securities Market and Stakeholder Group (SMSG) argued there is currently too much overlap between Article 8 and Article 9 funds and that too many asset managers are incorrectly using both Article 8 and Article 9 labels for sustainable strategies, as the latter has more specific ESG requirements than the former.

As a result, the SMSG is calling for Article 9 funds to become the “sole carriers of a green classification” with Article 8 funds’ ESG criteria “so broad that with some degree of measurability, virtually anything can fit into it”.

Potential mismatches between investors and products could be created, according to SMSG. “The Commission seems to have intended the [article] 8 category only as a disclosure category of intentional or unintentional ESG strategies (and the efforts to introduce minimum ESG criteria have not been successful yet), whereas in the market article, 8 products are often used as an ESG product category.

“The SMSG is of the opinion that [article] 9 funds should focus on thematic funds, green or project bond funds, engagement funds and impact investing, while these terms should be clearly defined.”

SMSG’s recommendations come at the same time new research from ESG advisory firm MainStreet Partners has revealed the extent of holding overlap between Article 8 and Article 9 fixed income strategies.

The firm found only 37% of green, social, and sustainably (GSS) invested fixed income funds surveyed were labelled as Article 8, with just 63% declaring an official sustainability objective.

SFDR labels have recently come under greater criticism. Last week, it was found that nearly a quarter of Article 9 funds were failing the “do no significant harm” test.

This research from Clarity AI found 18% of the 750 funds it analysed had exposure of over 10% to companies in violation of UNGC Principles or the OECD guidelines in multinational companies.

© 2023 funds europe

HAVE YOU READ?

THOUGHT LEADERSHIP

The tension between urgency and inaction will continue to influence sustainability discussions in 2024, as reflected in the trends report from S&P Global.
FIND OUT MORE
This white paper outlines key challenges impeding the growth of private markets and explores how technological innovation can provide solutions to unlock access to private market funds for a growing…
DOWNLOAD NOW

CLOUD DATA PLATFORMS

Luxembourg is one of the world’s premiere centres for cross-border distribution of investment funds. Read our special regional coverage, coinciding with the annual ALFI European Asset Management Conference.
READ MORE

PRIVATE MARKETS FUND ADMIN REPORT

Private_Markets_Fund_Admin_Report

LATEST PODCAST