ETFs: When companies are blacklisted

When the US increased sanctions against China increased earlier this year, it showed how the ETF industry can be vulnerable to government policy.

Benchmark providers revised listings, removing various Chinese companies from indices, while ETF providers such as BlackRock and Vanguard had to offload billions to comply with the new restrictions.

Geopolitical tensions are to be expected when investing in emerging markets. “It’s the nature of the beast,” says Mark Fitzgerald, head of product specialism at Vanguard, speaking to Funds Europe for the latest edition of the ETF report.

Vanguard was heavily impacted by the sanctions as it had significant exposure to the Chinese market. 

The Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF had more than 40% exposure to the Chinese market, while the Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund was reported to be one of the largest fund allocators to four of the blacklisted firms before the selloff. 

Meanwhile BlackRock’s iShares FTSE A50 China Index ETF lost its top spot as the largest fund tracking onshore Chinese stocks. 

For Rick Redding, chief executive of trade body Index Industry Association (IIA), the blacklisting of firms presents a complicated situation. 

“A lot of people don’t think through all the ramifications of it, but the whole idea of using indexes as policy tools is something that we don’t think appropriate, and it’s a little bit misplaced as people don’t appreciate where the index providers sit in the value chain,” he explains.

Sanctions can cause even more difficulties for bond indices, says Redding. Due to the lack of transparency, it can be hard to ascertain if a subsidiary is affected by sanctions against a specific company, or whether it is only the parent company affected. “It’s a very complex situation, there’s no doubt about it,” he adds.

According to Annie Shum, institutional business deputy head at Hong Kong-headquartered CSOP Asset Management, Sino-US tension is an ever-present issue. “Even with Joe Biden now in office, it is looking unlikely that the sanctions put in place by his predecessor would be retracted,” she says.

Shum highlights that while the sanctions have spurred US financial institutions and investors to revise their portfolios and trading practices, they failed to “cause a dimple to the Chinese equity market”.

Read the full article from the March ETF report here: Exchange-traded funds: Who are Chinese sanctions hurting?

©2021 funds europe



The tension between urgency and inaction will continue to influence sustainability discussions in 2024, as reflected in the trends report from S&P Global.
This white paper outlines key challenges impeding the growth of private markets and explores how technological innovation can provide solutions to unlock access to private market funds for a growing…


Luxembourg is one of the world’s premiere centres for cross-border distribution of investment funds. Read our special regional coverage, coinciding with the annual ALFI European Asset Management Conference.