Editorial: Stick to the science

Last month, we wrote about the EU’s anti-greenwashing regulation known as the SFDR. This month, we visit greenwashing again – but in doing so, we gain a clearer picture of what it is in practice.

It seems a remarkably easy sin to commit. A portfolio manager with a carbon-intensive stock may not be greenwashing if they drive positive change; a manager with a cleaner company could be, if neither the manager nor the corporate in question is striving to be better.

One commentator tells our ESG report (see pages 19-42) that companies and fund managers can avoid accusations of greenwashing by sticking to science-based targets to lessen negative sustainability impacts – targets that are tangible enough for investors to vote on.

But once voted on, it seems obvious that asset managers will have to hold themselves up for scrutiny by becoming exceptionally transparent with their voting records.

Anything less than this could be greenwashing.

Nick Fitzpatrick, Group Editor, Funds Europe

© 2021 funds europe

HAVE YOU READ?

THOUGHT LEADERSHIP

The tension between urgency and inaction will continue to influence sustainability discussions in 2024, as reflected in the trends report from S&P Global.
FIND OUT MORE
This white paper outlines key challenges impeding the growth of private markets and explores how technological innovation can provide solutions to unlock access to private market funds for a growing…
DOWNLOAD NOW

CLOUD DATA PLATFORMS

Through AI and ML and cloud-enabled ecosystems, managers are finding ways to cut operating costs, supercharge the customer experience and add value to the bottom line.
FIND OUT MORE

PRIVATE MARKETS FUND ADMIN REPORT

LATEST PODCAST