Investor group angered at Priips rejection

A consumer body has criticised members of the European Parliament for, it says, only considering the views of the financial services industry in its proposal for rejecting draft rules for the Priips regulations. Better Finance, which describes itself as a European federation of investors and financial services users, said its members back the Parliament’s proposed rejection of “misleading” and “overly complex” draft implementation rules under Priips, or Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investment Products regulations – but for different reasons to politicians. The European Supervisory Authorities drafted the proposed ‘regulatory technical standards’ for Priips – approved by the European Commission but facing rejection by MEPs – which would amend rules around how assetmanagers calculate and display fund charges and investment performance. Better Finance says the officially stated rationale for rejection of the technical standards omits mention of the elimination of past performance disclosures, including that of product benchmarks, which Better Finance feels is the most “crucial and critical issue” for EU citizens as savers. Omitting past performance from key information documents will prevent EU savers from knowing whether a product has made or lost money in the past, and whether it ever met its investment objective or promise, says the group. It will also prevent savers from comparing similar products, such as index and index-benchmarked funds, or choosing between different with-profit life insurance policies. Better Finance also believes the proposed rules are inconsistent with the EU initiative for a Capital Markets Union, which calls for greater transparency on the past performance of long-term savings products. MEPs will vote on the issue tomorrow. ©2016 funds europe

Sponsored Profiles

SPONSORED FEATURE: Alternative thinking

Mar 16, 2017

Portfolio Manager Davide Cataldo discusses the results of the Pioneer Investments’ survey on liquid alternatives and how investors can be encouraged to increase their allocation.

SPONSORED FEATURE: Interest rate risk hedging: Swapping to other options

Mar 16, 2017

Heightened margin requirements for cleared and uncleared OTC derivatives pose a challenge for legitimate hedging activities and are driving financial institutions to explore alternative hedging...

SPONSORED FEATURE: Why blockchain could be the fund industry’s next Ford Model T

Mar 16, 2017

Blockchain aims to radically change the way investors can access funds, says Olivier Portenseigne, Managing Director and Chief Commercial Officer of Fundsquare.

SPONSORED FEATURE: Open architecture: In need of protection

Mar 16, 2017

Greater efficiency must be embraced to ensure regulatory changes do not destroy choice for fund buyers, says Bernard Tancré of Clearstream.

Executive Interviews

INTERVIEW: Finding managers that can (and do)

Apr 18, 2017

Fabrice Kremer, a fund selector at Banque de Luxembourg Investments, has berated fundamental managers for failing to beat indices, but he remains committed to active funds. He speaks to Nick...

JERSEY INTERVIEW: ‘A steady sort of place’

Mar 21, 2017

The chief executive of Jersey Finance is keen to portray the island as a stable, trustworthy jurisdiction. He talks to George Mitton.

Roundtables

ROUNDTABLE: The issue is perception

Mar 21, 2017

Our panel discuss tax transparency, the elegance of private placement and why Jersey could do more to promote itself. Chaired by Tom Cowsill in Saint Helier.

ASSET SERVICING ROUNDTABLE: Under pressure

Mar 07, 2017

Funds Europe speaks to leading Luxembourg industry figures about the growing regulatory demands on asset servicers and how to remain profitable in spite of major investments in technology.