Bond indices aren't as safe as you think

IndicesInvestors should be careful before adopting a bond index as their benchmark, because these indices are more complex and may be less stable than they imagine, according to a report by the Edhec-Risk Institute. Investors have often considered bonds a safe haven and in recent years passive investing has become a popular way to gain exposure. But, says the report, “mixing bonds and passive investment turns out to be more complex than it first appears”. Edhec takes the example of corporate bond indices. A key problem is that the universe of bonds is larger and more diverse than that of equities. Bonds may be convertible, callable, floating or irredeemable, to name just a few types, and they have different time-to-maturities and credit ratings.  Many providers create sub-indices to try to account for this diversity. “Designing, computing, and maintaining corporate bond indices is far more complex than doing the same for a stock market index,” says the report. Because of this complexity, risk can vary between indices, and selecting an index can be a challenge. Edhec studied eight corporate bond indices and found that the US indices showed higher credit risk, with longer returns to maturity and hence longer durations, than the euro-denominated ones. “A typical broad index is unlikely to be the optimal benchmark for any investor,” says the report. Edhec also found that in the two indices with the fewest bonds, the exposure to interest rate and credit risk was more unstable. “Even if a particular index matches an investor’s desired risk exposures today, there is no guarantee that it will do so tomorrow,” says the report. “The fluctuations in risk exposures are incompatible with investors’ requirements that these exposures be relatively stable.” Different types of index have specific problems. Value-weighted corporate bond indices tend to be overweight in issuers that already have a large amount of outstanding debt. Because they are heavily indebted, these issuers are more likely to be downgraded or even default. Edhec offers the example of the European telecoms sector around the year 2000, when companies financed the very high cost of UMTS licences with corporate bonds. This meant that telecoms firm took up a larger proportion of the total bond market even though their creditworthiness was declining. Edhec concludes that bond indices must be improved before they can become as popular as equity ones. “Passive investing will gain ground only if bond index providers begin to develop better methods of constructing indices,” says the report. ©2011 funds europe

Executive Interviews

INTERVIEW: Put your money where your mouth is

Jun 10, 2016

At Kempen Capital Management, they believe portfolio managers should invest in their own funds. David Stevenson talks to Lars Dijkstra, CIO of the €42 billion manager.

EXECUTIVE INTERVIEW: ‘Volatility is the name of the game’

May 13, 2016

Axa Investment Managers chief executive officer, Andrea Rossi, talks to David Stevenson about bringing all his firm’s subsidiaries under one name and the opportunities that a difficult market...


ROUNDTABLE: Beyond the hype

Oct 13, 2016

The use of smart beta investing continues to grow. Our panel, made up of both providers and users, discusses what the strategy actually means, how it should be used and the kind of pitfalls that may arise when using this innovative investment technique.

MIFID II ROUNDTABLE: Following the direction of travel

Sep 07, 2016

Fund management firms Aberdeen and HSBC Global meet with specialist providers to speak about how the industry is evolving towards MiFID II.